Wednesday, March 13, 2013

PFT: Kruger to join Browns for $8-9M per season

PonderAP

Vikings receiver Percy Harvin was traded to the Seahawks reportedly in part because he wouldn?t stop complaining about quarterback Christian Ponder. That doesn?t bother Ponder.

Ponder told the Pioneer Press that he doesn?t know for sure that Harvin actually disliked him, but that if that?s the case, it?s irrelevant now.

?The thing is, there?s no quote strictly from Percy that he was the one saying it,? Ponder said. ?I haven?t put too much thought into it. If that was his opinion, that?s unfortunate. But he?s a Seahawk now, so it doesn?t really matter.?

Although Harvin may not have explicitly stated, on the record, that he has a problem with Ponder, it?s pretty obvious that he does: At his introductory press conference in Seattle he talked about how excited he is to be playing with Russell Wilson, and he raved about his time in Minnesota playing with Brett Favre. But Harvin declined to answer when asked about Ponder. For his part, Ponder said he hasn?t talked to Harvin since before the Vikings put him on injured reserve, ending his 2012 season.

Now Ponder says it?s time for everyone to move on.

?Seattle wins, because they get him. Percy wins ? he got a new contract, which was what he really has been wanting,? Ponder said. ?And we win, because we get some good draft picks. People have their opinions. There were things I could have done better [last season]. But now that he?s on a different team, his opinion doesn?t really mean much.?

A new contract is a big part of what Harvin has been wanting. But another big part was playing with a quarterback who is not Christian Ponder.

Source: http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/12/kruger-will-strike-it-richf-in-cleveland/related/

Rich Kids of Instagram felix hernandez julia child Ron Palillo Chad Johnson Twitter Helen Gurley Brown Kathi Goertzen

Lexus car owners are happiest with their dealers

Sure, those car dealers are easy to poke fun at. But a new study suggests American motorists are happy, on the whole, with the service they?re delivering.

For the fifth year in a row, Lexus led the closely-watched J.D. Power Customer Service Index, a measure of how well dealers are meeting owners? expectations for performance at their repair shops. Detroit-based GMC, meanwhile, jumped into the lead among mass-market brands, according to the market research firm.

The annual index found that customers are more satisfied by dealer service in general, especially with the service from factory-approved retailers as compared with independent facilities.

?Manufacturers have made large investments in their retail programs, and dealers have made significant investments in key customer touch-points?people, improved processes and customer waiting areas?which are having a profoundly positive impact on their customers,? said Chris Sutton, the JDPA senior director in charge of the 2013 survey.

The index focuses on what happens when vehicle owners visit a service department for either maintenance and repair work asking about five specific areas: service quality, service initiation, service advisor, service facility and vehicle pick-up.

While dealer service departments and independent repair outlets may be a traditional source of suspicion and complaints, the results of the latest survey indicate marked improvement in recent years. The average score was 797, on a 1,000-point scale, up from 787 last year, and a 29-point gain from 2011.

Toyota?s luxury brand Lexus maintained its winning streak in the 2013 index with a score of 862. Cadillac was a close second, at 858 points, followed by Jaguar, Acura and Infiniti. Notably, were Hyundai to sell its Equus models as an independent brand ? which it once considered ? the model would have outscored Lexus.

Three of the 11 luxury brands improved their scores by at least 20 points. So did five of the mainstream marques.

Among mass market brands, GMC landed a score of 819, followed by Mini, Buick, Chevrolet and Volkswagen.

Significantly, owners said they were generally more satisfied with the service they got from facilities affiliated with one of the major automakers rather than from independent service facilities.

On average, the owners who participated in the consumer index study visited a dealer service department an average 2.6 times a year, usually for maintenance rather than for repairs.

Overall satisfaction was particularly high among those motorists getting routine maintenance. That suggests the auto industry is making inroads as it shifts focus from traditional repair business. With today?s cars boasting better quality and reliability than ever before, more dealers are emphasizing such things as oil changes or tire rotation to keep their mechanics busy and the cash registers ringing.

Perhaps reflecting some belt-tightening as the economy continues to struggle, the 2013 index found that customers spent less out-of-pocket during visits to the repair shop, an average $118 compared to $125 the prior year. That could also reflect the fact that many makers have been adding routine maintenance to their traditional warranty coverage.

Satisfying customers has a number of advantages. It not only generates more revenue but increases customer loyalty, according to JDPA Director Sutton. Among index survey participants, in general, 38 percent said they ?definitely will? buy a vehicle from the same brand when it?s time to trade in. That jumped to 59 percent among customers who said they were ?delighted? by the service delivered by their dealers.

?The service experience has a profound impact on vehicle owners, not just where they take their vehicle the next time they need maintenance or repairs, but also on their next vehicle purchase,? Sutton said. ?Dealers know this, and most are taking the appropriate steps to ensure their customers have the best experience possible on both the sales and service sides of the store.?

The study includes responses from 91,000 owners of 2008 through 2012 model-year vehicles.

Related at The Detroit Bureau:

Troubled Plug-in Hybrid Maker Fisker's Founder & Chairman Quits

Audi Using Wind Power to Produce Synthetic, Earth-Friendly e-Gas for new A3 g-Tron

VW Will Reveal New U.S. Golf, Europe's Car of the Year, at NY Auto Show

Shake-Up Coming at Cadillac as it Puts Ad Account Up for Review

Copyright ? 2009-2013, The Detroit Bureau

Source: http://www.nbcnews.com/business/lexus-car-owners-are-happiest-their-dealers-1C8852994

paula abdul cinnamon challenge lou dobbs rock salt david letterman march of dimes james randi

Westin Hotels Announces Global Roll Out of ... - Franchising.com

On the Heels of Successful Pilot the Highly Functional, Technology Driven Flexible Space is Rolling out to More than 40 Hotels Around the World

STAMFORD, Conn. - March 12, 2013 - (BUSINESS WIRE) - Today, Westin Hotels & Resorts announces the global roll out of Tangent? (formerly known as Project Hive), an innovative workspace concept that meets the changing needs of today?s mobile business traveler. The new flexible workspace reinvents the small meetings model and has proven highly successful ? receiving rave reviews and high usage from both guests and neighboring businesses in pilot hotel locations. Tangent is currently available at The Westin Boston Waterfront, The Westin Arlington Gateway Hotel and made its debut at The Westin Grand Munich this month. The offering will continue to roll out to more than 40 hotels worldwide this year including The Westin Resort Nusa Dua, Bali and The Westin Copley Place, Boston.

?Tangent?s unique offering is really striking a chord with today?s mobile workforce and driving demand for more locations across our global portfolio,? said Brian Povinelli, Global Brand Leader for Westin Hotels. ?In our efforts to meet the needs of today?s mobile traveler, we are changing the way we do business to better customize the guest experience. While a hotel room or lobby is a place where you can do work, Tangent was specifically designed as a smart room and personalized work space that enhances productivity and can be booked on demand.?

In the U.S. 75% of the workforce is mobile and by the end of this year one-third of the global workforce will follow suit. In Westin hotel?s in-depth guest research, more than 70% of business travelers said an environment that better suits their work objectives would significantly improve their business travel experience. Forty-eight percent of travelers informed the brand that having facilities available whenever they wanted to use them would positively impact their hotel stay. Today?s business travelers are more portable and global than ever and are in need of a turn-key business and meeting solution designed for collaboration and connectivity. As a result, the Tangent workspace is highly-functional and fully-equipped, featuring media:scape by Steelcase technology, video conferencing, and seamless connectivity and collaboration areas. The Westin brand?s new offering is perfect for small impromptu meetings and can be booked by the hour, at a moment?s notice.

The brand?s signature new workspace features:

  • media:scape by Steelcase technology that offers an interactive space for participants to access and share digital information quickly and seamlessly. Video conferencing is also available at a four person seated workspace.
  • Televisions, printers, sound systems, Xbox 360? for games or DVDs.
  • Floor-to-ceiling white boards and fully stocked office supplies offer convenience and promote collaboration.
  • Wired and wireless internet for no additional fee. Flexible outlets are also located throughout the space allowing devices to power up regardless of location.
  • Privacy for groups of up to four to conduct small group meetings or hold calls and teleconferences.

The Westin brand?s design team worked to create a space that also embraced the trend of ?co-working? where flexible, temporary, collaborative workspaces are becoming imperative for high-performance work. Within a small footprint of 260 square feet or less, Tangent?s workspace consists of communal, interactive and individual work zones. The design team also used the Westin brand?s inspiration from nature to create the color palate for the space and a large-scale wall mural. The inspiration for the mural was derived from Fibonacci sequences, which is a sequence of numbers that generate patterns found in nature, like the spiral of a shell. The color palette was also inspired by colors found in minerals and crystals to create a neutral base of grey, with accents of amber, emerald and sapphire blue.

For more information on Tangent please visit westin.com/tangent. For more information about Westin Hotels & Resorts, please visit www.westin.com, Facebook or follow Westin on Twitter.

About Westin Hotels & Resorts

Westin Hotels & Resorts offers innovative programs that transform every aspect of a stay into a revitalizing experience. All Westin signature services ? like the Heavenly Bed, delicious SuperFoods and WestinWORKOUT studio ? have been designed with the guests? well-being in mind. Westin hotels, with more than 190 hotels and resorts in nearly 40 countries and territories, is owned by Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. (NYSE: HOT) one of the leading hotel and leisure companies in the world with 1,134 properties in nearly 100 countries and 171,000 employees at its owned and managed properties. Starwood is a fully integrated owner, operator and franchisor of hotels, resorts and residences with the following internationally renowned brands: St. Regis?, The Luxury Collection?, W?, Westin?, Le M?ridien?, Sheraton?, Four Points? by Sheraton, Aloft?, and ElementSM. The Company boasts one of the industry?s leading loyalty programs, Starwood Preferred Guest (SPG), allowing members to earn and redeem points for room stays, room upgrades and flights, with no blackout dates. Starwood also owns Starwood Vacation Ownership, Inc., a premier provider of world-class vacation experiences through villa-style resorts and privileged access to Starwood brands. For more information, please visit www.starwoodhotels.com.

(Note: This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities regulations. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance or events and involve risks and uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results or events to differ materially from those anticipated at the time the forward-looking statements are made. These risks and uncertainties are presented in detail in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Although we believe the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance that our expectations will be attained or that results and events will not materially differ. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.)

Contacts:

Westin Hotels & Resorts
Nadeen Ayala
203-351-2542
Nadeen.ayala@starwoodhotels.com

Nancy J. Friedman PR
212-228-1500
Jenna Newmark
Jenna@NJFPR.com

Courtney Long
Courtney@NJFPR.com

###

Social Reach:

Viewer Response:

Source: http://www.franchising.com/news/20130312_westin_hotels_announces_global_roll_out_of_revolut.html

Hurricane Categories Hurricane Sandy new jersey atlantic city ocean city maryland Nexus 7 KDKA

'Children,' 'One Life' get reborn online April 29

The cast of One Life To Live is seen in an undated photo provided by Ferencomm for The Online Network. The Online Network (TOLN) announced Monday, March 11, 2013 the highly-anticipated online debuts of the beloved long-running serial dramas ?All My Children? and ?One Life to Live? for Monday, April 29. (AP Photo/Ferencomm for The Online Network)

The cast of One Life To Live is seen in an undated photo provided by Ferencomm for The Online Network. The Online Network (TOLN) announced Monday, March 11, 2013 the highly-anticipated online debuts of the beloved long-running serial dramas ?All My Children? and ?One Life to Live? for Monday, April 29. (AP Photo/Ferencomm for The Online Network)

(AP) ? It's not uncommon for soap opera characters thought dead to spring back to life. Now, a pair of soap operas thought dead are being resurrected.

Venerable daytime dramas "All My Children" and "One Life to Live" will soon be reborn online after getting the ax little more than a year ago by ABC, which had broadcast them for decades.

Prospect Park's The Online Network has set its debuts of both long-running soaps for April 29. Both will appear each weekday with new 30-minute episodes available to stream on computers for free on the Hulu website.

Subscribers to Hulu Plus can watch them on a variety of other devices. Episodes will also be available on iTunes.

Production began on "All My Children" last month, and shooting starts for "One Life to Live" next week. Both series are produced in Stamford, Conn.

Agnes Nixon, the soap opera pioneer who created the shows more than 40 years ago, is serving as creative consultant for their online revivals.

"I am so pleased that our dream of bringing these two series back to life is coming to fruition," she said.

Prospect Park partners Jeff Kwatinetz and Rich Frank are promising "new and creatively ground-breaking episodes that both the fans, as well as legions of new viewers, will love."

Joining new cast members, a number of favorites from the long broadcast run of each soap are returning.

Veteran "All My Children" stars include David Canary, Julia Barr, Jill Larsen, Cady McClain and Debbi Morgan. Fan favorites back on "One Life to Live" include Erika Slezak, Robert S. Woods, Robin Strasser and Hillary B. Smith.

The broadcast version of "One Life to Live" premiered on ABC in 1968 and aired through January 2012. "All My Children" ran from January 1970 to September 2011.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/4e67281c3f754d0696fbfdee0f3f1469/Article_2013-03-11-Soap%20Operas%20Resurrected/id-dd1f9886d5e642ddabd4c37ee4955428

jennifer hudson trial north korea threat brandon jacobs brandon jacobs brian dawkins emma roberts north korea news

Tuesday, March 12, 2013

Political parties called to discuss Land Acquisition Bill

Delhi- Parliamentary Affairs Minister has called for a meeting of political parties on 7th March with regard to the planning of land acquisition bill. The government wants to move ahead with the bill and also the concern raised over the proposed legislation will be discussed in the meeting which will take place on first week of March.

Political parties including BJP, the Left, Trinamool Congress, Samajwadi Party, Bahujan Samaj Party and the JD(U), are expected to participate in the meeting.

During the last winter session of parliament, government had decided to move ahead with the 157 amendments to the land acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, which was introduced in September last year.

This amendment is related to various ranges of facts and issues like change in the consent clause, the scope of public purpose, the level of compensation, and change in the name of the Bill to ?The Right to Fair Compensation, Resettlement, Rehabilitation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Bill?. The Opposition parties advised that the changes should be verified and revisited by the Standing Committee.

Rural Minister has confirmed that there is no turning back from the foremost decision taken. According to public 101 of the 157 amendments could be categorized as typographical and technical.

However the opposition has raised some concerns including need for higher compensation for landowners and the land-dependent people. They claim that the Bill seems to favor landowners over those acquiring land.

Related Real Estate News:

Noida Authority to construct Rs 2.20 crore foot overbridge

Noida authority plans 7 new parking lots

Source: http://www.commonfloor.com/news/political-parties-called-to-discuss-land-acquisition-bill-48666

whitney houston news sylvia plath whitney houston autopsy results obama trayvon jim yong kim michael bush the host trailer

GOP budget takes aim again at Obamacare, Medicaid

WASHINGTON (AP) ? House Republicans are sticking to their guns on the federal budget, promising to try to repeal so-called Obamacare, cut domestic programs from Medicaid to college grants and require future Medicare patients to bear more of the program's cost.

The point is to prove it's possible to balance the budget within 10 years by simply cutting spending and avoiding further tax hikes, even as the fiscal blueprint to be released Tuesday by Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, R-Wis., will be dead on arrival with the White House and Democrats controlling the Senate.

Senate Democrats promise to offer a counterproposal on Wednesday with higher spending on domestic programs and additional tax hikes on top of the higher rates imposed on top-bracket earners in January. It will, in turn, arrive as a dead letter in the GOP-controlled House.

At issue on Tuesday and beyond in the congressional budget process, one that is arcane and partisan both ? and unlikely to illustrate a path forward in a gridlocked Washington. At stake are so-called budget resolutions, which are nonbinding measures that have the potential to stake out parameters for follow-up legislation cutting spending and rewriting the complex U.S. tax code.

But this year's dueling GOP and Democratic budget proposals are more about defining political differences ? as if last year's elections didn't do enough of that ? than charting a path forward toward a solution. Congressional budgets often simply state party positions, and invariably are partisan endeavors.

The partisan exercise comes even as President Barack Obama was to travel to Capitol Hill on Tuesday to meet with Senate Democrats in an attempt to resuscitate his failed efforts for bipartisanship.

Ryan, who became a national GOP figure as the losing vice presidential nominee last year, has for now settled back into his wonkish role as Budget Committee chairman and chief tutor for dozens of relatively junior Republicans. He's also armed with a full battery of budget bromides.

"We're introducing a budget that balances in 10 years ? without raising taxes," Ryan said in an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal. "How do we do it? We stop spending money the government doesn't have." All told, Ryan's plan would slash $4.6 trillion in spending over the coming decade.

"On the current path, we'll spend $46 trillion over the next 10 years. Under our proposal, we'll spend $41 trillion," Ryan said. "On the current path, spending will increase by 5 percent each year. Under our proposal, it will increase by 3.4 percent."

The House Budget Committee has scheduled a vote on the soon-to-be-released measure Wednesday, and the Senate Budget panel is slated to vote Thursday on rival legislation by new Budget Committee Chairwoman Patty Murray, D-Wash., who promises new tax revenues but few cuts from domestic programs like Medicare and Medicaid.

"We are working towards fair and balanced, which is what the American public has said time and time again that they want," Murray said. "We need to make sure that everybody participates in getting us to a budget that deals with our debt and our deficit responsibly."

For his part, Ryan has resurrected a controversial Medicare proposal that replaces traditional Medicare for those currently under 55 with a government subsidy to buy health insurance on the open market. Critics of the plan say the subsidies won't grow with inflation fast enough and would shove thousands of dollars in higher premiums onto seniors before very long.

The House GOP plan again proposes sharp cuts to Medicaid, tighter food stamp eligibility rules and more than $1 trillion in savings over a decade by repealing Obama's signature overhaul of the U.S. health care system. It seeks to preserve the Pentagon budget, but only at the expense of proposing domestic agency budgets that may prove too low for GOP moderates and the pragmatists atop the Appropriations Committee responsible for guiding them into law.

Even as it proposes repealing Obamacare, the Ryan plan banks more than $700 billion in the health care law's cuts to Medicare providers over a decade ? just as more than $600 billion in tax hikes on the wealthy enacted in January make it easier for Ryan's budget to predict balance.

At the White House, Press Secretary Jay Carney was asked about Obama's failure to submit a budget on time.

"The president has always believed that deficit reduction is not a goal unto itself," Carney said. "The proposals he's put forward keep the number one objective in mind, which is economic growth and job creation, not deficit reduction solely for the purpose of reducing the deficit."

As the two side battle over future-year budgets, top Senate Democrats and Republicans late Monday released a catchall government funding bill for the ongoing fiscal year that denies Obama new money for implementing signature first-term accomplishments like new regulations on Wall Street and his expansion of government health care subsidies, but provides modest additional funding for domestic priorities like health research and highway projects.

Monday's measure was the product of bipartisan negotiations and is the legislative vehicle to fund the day-to-day operations of government through Sept. 30 ? and prevent a government shutdown when current funding runs out March 27.

It sets a path for government after across-the-board spending cuts that took effect March 1. In most cases the minor changes in agency budgets amount to housekeeping within a trillion-dollar cap for the day-to-day operations of agencies in the current budget year.

Passage in the Senate this week seems routine and could presage an end to a mostly overlooked battle between House Republicans and Obama and his Senate Democratic allies over the annual spending bills required to fund federal agency operations.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/gop-budget-takes-aim-again-obamacare-medicaid-071015348--politics.html

ufc 145 fight card ufc145 chimpanzee chimpanzee the lucky one pittsburgh pirates mariners

Monday, March 11, 2013

On Society and Economics in Herzl's Altneuland ? Jewish Business ...

-

/ By Dr Ushi Shoham Krausez /

דר אושי שוהם?According to Herzl?s classic work ?Altneuland? in the Palestinian state to be established, men would wear top hats and business suits while walking the streets decorated with mosques.? The women would be wearing European style hats and chattering about the latest fashions from Paris.? Names such as Max, Freidrich and yes, even Fritzcan fill the rolls.? Thus it is eminently clear that the founders would be elite personages addressed as ?Herr Doctor? or ?Herr Engineer?.

?

Moreover, one of the especially interesting items in this novel is that Herzl never actually mentions a state for the Jewish people.? In this book he proposes a social, economic structure that is unique: A cooperative society not only from the aspect of a society of men or an ?Israeli Society? but from the aspect of a cooperative business venture.

Herzl does not detail or present a final structure for his idea nevertheless there is something very interesting here.

The founders-representatives of international Jewish funds and wealthy Jewish business people would establish a stock company.? This company, which employs people, is a called reconciliation company.

What do does this mean?

The example proposed here is taken directly from the colonial history of Europe.? We are referring, for example, to the British East Indian Company formed to settle Eastern India.? This was a stock company that, in the year 1600 received from the queen of England, Elizabeth the first, a special charter granting it the exclusive trading rights in Eastern India.

This company was the major factor in the British capture of India.

The company traded, settled and also managed parts of the Indian mechanisms.

Herzl speaks of developing a similar system with slight differences.

Similar because he proposes a stock company whose purpose it was to settle an Eastern land and to establish there a thriving economy, factories and more.

However, there would be two differences.

First, there is no independent state that establishes a company to settle another country. Instead there would be appointed representatives of a people that lived for hundreds of years dispersed socially and culturally throughout the entire world.? These representatives-the wealthy business men would establish in effect a new national//social/business society by means of a completely private initiative.

However the most important point in this plan is the fact that this stock company formed by the founders is not designed to be eternally profitable for the founders.

True they are not expected to lose money.? On the contrary, Herzl emphasizes more than once the profit incentive inherent in the free market. They would not give up the profits but instead, at the right time, transfer at a fair price their shares in the national, general company that will replace the stock company

It is difficult to describe the legal standing of such a company and it is doubtful if such a model exists in the world whereby a group of citizens are associated in a socioeconomic manner and not necessarily in a national one.? It is possible however to imagine such a structure as a sort of giant cooperative open to anyone interested in joining its services.

Yes with no differences in race, creed, religion or sex.

This company would settle Palestine with the aid of the immediate recognition by Turkish Sultan who would retain control over it.

In Herzl?s literary imagination, if so, the settlement stock company would be established by benefactors and business people.? This company was meant to settle the country and cause it to flourish.

-??

From a Business Society to an Economic Society

First of all it must be understood that Herzl?s models are neither defined nor detailed fully.? In ?Altneuland? he doesn?t present an organized plan for establishing a Jewish settlement in Palestine. He speaks in prophetic terms but it is important to stress that it is a reasoned prophesy from a value standpoint.

The stock company that would establish the Jewish society would purchase land, import agricultural equipment, cattle and plants and build railroad tracks.? It would even build housing for workers.

At this point it is possible to say that this is an example of a type of Fordistic society.? ?

By this is meant a business society that would bring in people to work for it and would give them all the necessary conditions to live in the work area and even a salary that would not be a meager one but which would enable them to purchase the products they produce and even leave a bit of profit.

But this is not what Herzl wanted.

His plan was based on the model of Ireland in the 19th century where the lord of the manor enabled his farmers to work and in the end establish a mutual cooperative that would manage the work, buy and sell and enable the farmers to profit from their labors.

And this is what Herzl wanted.

The stock company would replace the socioeconomic structure.? The citizens of Palestine would be divided into two classes. One class would be a large cooperative association called ?the new society? and it would own the shares of all of the infrastructure, the land and all property.? The second class would be everyone else living there but who did not wish to be partners in the ?new society?.

What is important to note is that those who wanted to could be accepted into the ?new society? without any consideration of religion, sex or race.? That is to say, despite the fact that this entire enterprise was meant to solve the problem of European Jewry, the society would be open to all regardless of race or religion or sex..

This is a most liberal vision without a doubt.

-

Regarding Free Initiative and a Good Life

And how do you integrate business with a free association of workers?

The establishing share holders need not be ?suckers? (Herzl of course, words it differently).? Not only are they not meant to lose money or be philanthropists, they are meant to profit.

And the profits will come from the enhancement of the new settlement and from the labor of the workers.

In effect this would be the model: farmers would receive free land, would farm it, improve it and earn a living from it.

The value of the land would grow due to its cultivation and the cultivation of the wilderness and this will enable the ?new society? that will inherit the stock company to obtain loans from abroad where the security would be the flourishing land.? The money obtained from these loans would be used to repay the original investors and the loans would be repaid by hard work.

Here may be seen the Herzl?s central premise: the combination of Capitalism and free enterprise with cooperative associations of workers.

We will explain.

Herzl loved the advantages of the Capitalistic system but as a son of the enlightenment movement of the 19th century he understood very well its disadvantages.

He recognized the power of Capitalism and free enterprise to create immense factories, to cultivate the wilderness and create progress.? However he did not forget the oppression of the workers, the poverty and the ignorance it could also create.

And so he tried to combine the two extremes.

Investors were invited to come, act and profit.

They could join the ?new society? or become citizens of Palestine without joining.

In the event that they wished to join the select, idealistic and lovely Zionist enterprise they could profit but within certain limits.

In the end they would sell their factories to the ?new society? at a nice profit and these factories would be transferred to the general public and for their benefit.

The cooperative associations would be found everywhere and operate for the benefit of their members.

In addition the means of communication could be either private or cooperative.

Here.

-

Communication

Recently we heard of a new initiative by ultra-religious youth.? When you call a specific number you hear a synopsis of the latest news supplied by the ?system? associated with this telephone.

Actually this was Herzl?s idea.

In Altneuland it would be possible to hear news over the telephone.

It was called the telephone newspaper.

And since the new settlement would be completely new and would not be built on an older infrastructure like European cities, everything there would be clean and organized.

Thus even the telephone cables would run completely underground and the telephone company would pay the ?new society? just for the rights to use the underground conduits of he infrastructure to run their cables through.

And the printed newspaper?

Indeed there would be some and one of them would represent an example for a cooperative association.

It would belong to the shareholders.

Each subscriber would become a shareholder in the newspaper and would have the responsibility, via a representative committee, for the subscriptions to the system and for establishing the style of the newspaper and its general level.

In this way the ?new society? would fight the manipulation and jingoism of the press.

-

And what is missing?

The problem is that there are many things missing and much that Herzl simply ignores.

Perhaps due to na?vet? or simply because he wished to present a utopian vision that could guide more practical people to realize his dream.

In any event, Herzl ignores the model of a national European country.? This is the type of country we recognize in which there is a defined territory within which resides a certain people who are the majority.? It is important to note that this is not the only model for a political organization that has arisen during the course of history.? However, this is the model that has developed in Europe over the last few hundred years and which is likely to change in the future.

It is possible to say therefore that Herzl presented a new model but that he is ignored today, for all sorts of reasons, by people today.? Thus a very important national feeling has been lost to many people.

This is how we were educated.

The Jews like most people wanted a national homeland for themselves.

Herzl also did not give much consideration to the Arabs.

In his view they would simply agree to everything, and most importantly they would be satisfied and grateful.? They would profit economically, educationally and sanitarily.? However, according to Herzl they had no political ambitions.? And since the new society as all land in the Middle East belonged to the Turkish sultan there was no need for an army.

Don?t forget, neither Egypt, Syria or Lebanon were political entities at the time.

There was no national-military danger.

And what is the conclusion?

This vision can appear extremely bold and innocent (at least from a social standpoint) however it contains many elements worthy of thought.? What is your opinion, for example about cancelling national democracies which characterizes most of the world of our times and replacing them with business companies- for the benefit of all?

Perhaps instead of being citizens we would become share holders being able to improve our lives.

Worth considering, no?

Source: http://jewishbusinessnews.com/2013/03/10/on-society-and-economics-in-herzls-altneuland/

cispa space shuttle new york courtney upshaw catch me if you can delmon young arrested the raven the raven

Syrian refugee numbers could triple by year-end: U.N

ANKARA (Reuters) - The number of refugees outside Syria could triple by the end of the year from the 1 million now if there is no resolution to the conflict, the head of the U.N. refugee agency said on Sunday.

The millionth Syrian refugee was registered in Jordan on Wednesday, following a dramatic acceleration in the number of civilians fleeing war in their homeland.

Syrians started trickling out of the country nearly two years ago when President Bashar al-Assad's forces shot at pro-democracy protests inspired by Arab revolts elsewhere.

The uprising has since turned into an increasingly sectarian struggle between armed rebels and government soldiers and militias. An estimated 70,000 people have been killed.

The U.N. refugee body, UNHCR, says more than 400,000 Syrian refugees - nearly half the total - have fled Syria since January 1. Around half the refugees are children, most of them under 11.

In December, there were 3,000 refugees on average a day. In January, it had risen to 5,000. By February, there were 8,000.

"If this escalation goes on ... we might have in the end of the year a much larger number of refugees, two or three times the present level," High Commissioner for Refugees Antonio Guterres told reporters in Ankara.

"Everything depends on whether or not we will have a political solution but we need to be prepared for a very strong increase of the present numbers," he said.

Most refugees have fled to Lebanon, Jordan, Turkey, Iraq and Egypt and some to North Africa and Europe. In addition to the refugees, the UNHCR says more than 2 million of Syria's 22 million people have been internally displaced.

TURKISH CAMPS

Guterres, who is on a 4-day visit to Turkey, also warned of the risk of an "explosion" in the Middle East if there was no political end to the conflict in Syria, which has increasingly spilled beyond its borders. He did not elaborate.

Guterres will meet Turkish leaders during his trip as well as visiting a refugee camp near the Syrian border.

In a meeting with four parliamentarians of Turkey's main opposition Republican People's Party (CHP) in Damascus on Thursday, Assad said he couldn't control some parts of Syria, accusing Turkey of backing "terrorists".

"We can't control all parts of Syria. We are focused on big cities. There are terrorist attacks in the countryside," Assad said according to the report published by CHP on Sunday.

"Some 75 percent of Syria's border with Turkey is controlled by al Qaeda and some 25 percent is under the PKK (The Kurdistan Worker's Party that is designated as a terrorist group by Turkey, U.S. and EU)."

The visit of the legislators angered Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan, who was accused by Assad of desiring further tension in Syria. Turkey shares a 900-km (560-mile) border with Syria, and Erdogan is seen as a pivotal player in backing the Syrian opposition and in planning for the era after al-Assad.

"Erdogan and Qatari Emir have made the Syrian crisis a personal issue ... to further survive in their positions and to adopt their Islamist agenda in Syria," Assad said.

Turkey, which has more than 185,000 Syrians registered in camps on its territory, and tens of thousands more living in towns and cities, has long advocated setting up internationally protected zones inside Syria to protect fleeing civilians.

However, the notion has gained little traction in Western countries, who do not want to get further embroiled in the Syrian conflict.

Guterres said his agency was not against such safe zones in general but that they should not undermine the right for refugees to seek asylum in other countries.

Despite pledges of $1.5 billion by international donors for a U.N. response plan to help Syria's displaced, only 25 percent has been funded, UNHCR has said.

Turkey alone says it has spent some $700 million setting up 17 refugee camps, with more under construction. But the country's disaster and relief management body, AFAD, said last week the actual cost of caring for the refugees was closer to $1.5 billion.

There is no end in sight to the conflict in Syria, which has divided world powers.

(Additional reporting by Seltem Iyigun; Editing by Stephen Powell)

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/u-n-says-syrian-refugee-numbers-could-triple-112247944.html

Mens Gymnastics Allison Schmitt Olympic Schedule Kyla Ross Ryan Lochte Montenegro Olympic Games

Afghanistan's Karzai alleges U.S., Taliban are colluding

KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) ? Afghan President Hamid Karzai on Sunday accused the Taliban and the U.S. of working in concert to convince Afghans that violence will worsen if most foreign troops leave ? an allegation the top American commander in Afghanistan rejected as "categorically false."

Karzai said two suicide bombings that killed 19 people on Saturday ? one outside the Afghan Defense Ministry and the other near a police checkpoint in eastern Khost province ? show the insurgent group is conducting attacks to demonstrate that international forces will still be needed to keep the peace after their current combat mission ends in 2014.

"The explosions in Kabul and Khost yesterday showed that they are at the service of America and at the service of this phrase: 2014. They are trying to frighten us into thinking that if the foreigners are not in Afghanistan, we would be facing these sorts of incidents," he said during a nationally televised speech about the state of Afghan women.

Karzai is known for making incendiary comments in his public speeches, a tactic that is often attributed to him trying to appeal to Taliban sympathizers or to gain leverage when he feels his international allies are ignoring his country's sovereignty. In previous speeches, he has threatened to join the Taliban and called his NATO allies occupiers who want to plunder Afghanistan's resources.

U.S. and NATO forces commander Gen. Joseph Dunford said Karzai had never expressed such views to him, but said it was understandable that tensions would arise as the coalition balances the need to complete its mission and the Afghans' move to exercise more sovereignty.

"We have fought too hard over the past 12 years, we have shed too much blood over the last 12 years, to ever think that violence or instability would be to our advantage," Dunford said.

Karzai also denounced the arrest of a university student Saturday by Afghan forces his aide said were working for the CIA. It was unclear why the student was detained.

Presidential spokesman Aimal Faizi said in an interview with The Associated Press that the CIA freed the student after Karzai's staff intervened, but that Karzai wants the alleged Afghan raiders arrested. The president issued a decree on Sunday banning all international forces and the Afghans working with them from entering universities and schools without Afghan government permission.

The Karzai government's latest comments and actions come as it negotiates a pact with the U.S. for the long-term presence of American forces in Afghanistan and just days after an agreement to transfer a U.S. prison outside of Kabul to Afghan authority fell through. They also came during U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel's first visit to Afghanistan since becoming the Pentagon chief, a trip made in part to meet with Karzai. Hours after Karzai's speech, their joint news conference was canceled by officials citing security concerns, though officials said the two men still planned to meet privately.

Karzai said in his speech that any foreign powers that want to keep troops in Afghanistan need to do so under conditions set forward by Afghanistan.

"We will tell them where we need them, and under which conditions. They must respect our laws. They must respect the national sovereignty of our country and must respect all our customs," Karzai said.

Karzai offered no proof of coordination, but said the Taliban and the United States were in "daily negotiations" in various foreign countries and noted that the United States has said that it no longer considers the insurgent group its enemy. The U.S. continues to fight against the Taliban and other militant groups, but has expressed its backing for formal peace talks with the Taliban to find a political resolution to the war.

Karzai said he did not believe the Taliban's claim that they launched Saturday's attacks to show they are still a potent force fighting the United States. "Yesterday's explosions, which the Taliban claimed, show that in reality they are saying they want the presence of foreigners in Afghanistan," Karzai said.

In the incident at the Kandahar university Saturday, presidential spokesman Faizi said the raiders fired shots as they grabbed student Abdul Qayoum, and blindfolded him before taking him for interrogation at a CIA post that Taliban leader Mullah Omar once used as a home.

The CIA could not be reached for comment.

The CIA has trained an Afghan counterterrorist force several thousand strong, known as the Counterterrorism Pursuit Team, which works mostly in insurgent strongholds in southern and eastern Afghanistan. U.S. officials say they work in concert with the Afghan intelligence service, but Karzai frequently complains he lacks oversight over their operations.

____

Associated Press writers Lolita C. Baldor and Heidi Vogt contributed to this report from Kabul.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/afghan-leader-alleges-us-taliban-colluding-075031783.html

kanye west theraflu joey votto the masters live mega millions winner holy thursday chris stewart evo 4g lte

EFF announces its intention to fight the subpoena, and WordPress ...

From: Paul Sieminski
Subject: Response to Subpoena to Automattic, Inc.

Date: March 8, 2013 2:39:47 PM PST
To: paduffy@wefightpiracy.com

Re: Prenda Law, Inc. v. Paul A. Godfread, Alan Cooper, et al.
Circuit Court of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St. Clair County, Illinois, Case No. 13-L-75

Mr. Duffy:

I write in response to Prenda Law, Inc.?s subpoena to Automattic, Inc. (?Automattic?) (relating to the WordPress.com sites dietrolldie.com and fightcopyrighttrolls.com). Your subpoena is legally deficient and objectionable for numerous reasons, enumerated below, and Automattic will not produce any documents in response to this subpoena.

  • First, the subpoena purports to relate to an action pending in Illinois, but in violation of California Code of Civil Procedure (?CCP?) Sections 2029.350 and 2029.390, it is not on the proper form for a subpoena for production of business records in action pending outside of California and it fails to attach a true and correct copy of the Illinois subpoena. Indeed, the form served on Automattic is for appearance at a trial or hearing, and in violation of the instructions of the subpoena, you direct Automattic to serve documents to your office and not to the clerk of the court as required.
  • Second, the subpoena purports to require production of business records in Chicago, Illinois, in violation of CCP Section 2025.250.
  • Third, the subpoena was issued in Marin County, when the discovery is to be conducted in San Francisco County, in violation of CCP Section 2029.350(b)(4).
  • Fourth, the subpoena was issued on February 22, 2013, yet you demand compliance by March 4, 2013, in violation of CCP Section 2020.410, which requires a minimum of 20 days to respond following the issuance of the subpoena.
  • Fifth, the subpoena improperly asks Automattic to create a document and to supply information, rather than properly asking for documents from a nonparty.

?

In addition to the numerous legal deficiencies that render the subpoena invalid, it is also objectionable on numerous fronts.

  • First, it seeks information protected by the First Amendment, including rights under the First Amendment to anonymous speech.
  • Second, it violates the right to privacy under the California Constitution and common law, in that it seeks information relating to the websites that consumers visited.
  • Third, it is facially (and outrageously) overly broad, in that it is not limited to information related to any alleged defamatory posts, but instead seeks the identity of any person who ever read the blogs in question.
  • Finally, it seeks information that is not likely to lead to discoverable information, for the reasons enumerated above.

Please contact me should you have any questions or concerns. A copy of this message will also follow by US Mail.

Paul Sieminski
General Counsel
Automattic Inc. | WordPress.com

Source: http://fightcopyrighttrolls.com/2013/03/09/eff-announces-its-intention-to-fight-the-subpoena-and-wordpress-refuses-to-comply-with-this-subpoena/

super bowl coin toss best superbowl commercials madonna super bowl halftime kelly clarkson super bowl giants super bowl 2012 half time show halftime show 2012

Saturday, March 9, 2013

On International Women's Day, Russian women want change ? not gifts

International Women's Day is one of the few holidays inherited from the old Soviet calendar that remains universally and genuinely popular in Russia.

It's a kind of cross between Mother's Day and Valentine's Day in the West, with just the faintest hints of its early-Soviet-era aura of militant feminism thrown in.

But several women who are active leaders in various fields say that this year they are taking a hard look their lives in a wider political and social context, and thinking about ways to change the long-standing male-dominated status quo in politics, business, and the professions.

RECOMMENDED: Do you know anything about Russia? A quiz.

"We do see some change in the attitude toward women in our society. People are beginning to understand that equal rights are a must," says Albina Shirobokova, head of the Angara Union of Women, a civil society group in Irkutsk, Siberia.

"There are some signs that politics are beginning to work more in our interests. And women are more independent than they used to be. Life has forced them to take care of themselves," she says.

All of Russia shuts down on March 8. Men make a beeline for the family hearth, bearing flowers, chocolates, and gifts ? according to a survey by the Russia-based MAR Consult company, men in Moscow alone will fork out $550 million on presents for their womenfolk this year ? and spend the evening feasting and offering up toasts of praise for mothers, wives, daughters, and sweethearts, as well as women in general.

But, in a well-worn Russian cliche, many women still end the day wondering why they're the ones who have to do all the cleaning-up afterward.

"I love the attention, I adore my family, and I don't think my life is awful at all," says Galina Buryakina, a 30-something Moscow accountant.

"Still, nothing ever changes. I sometimes wish my husband would take this day to talk [about] our lives and how we might rearrange things to make it better, rather than making a big deal out of flowers and candies and rote speeches," she says.

The Soviet Union "emancipated" women long before the West did by bringing most females into the workforce, giving them equal access to higher education, and creating a system of universal state-funded child care. But it also locked them into low-paid professional ghettos such as medicine ? a majority of Soviet doctors were women ? teaching, science, and engineering. It set quotas that ensured strong representation of women in the Supreme Soviet, Communist Party committees, and trade union bodies, even if the upper echelons remained a male preserve.

But the quota system evaporated at the USSR's end, much of the infrastructure devoted to helping working mothers collapsed, and men started invading professions like medicine as they became more prestigious and lucrative in the new market-based economy.

"On one hand, the past few years have been economically favorable, and the material conditions of life have improved for a lot of women," says Oksana Dmitrieva, a Duma deputy and former minister of labor.

"On the other hand, the old Soviet mechanisms of advancement are gone, and new democratic institutions that should promote social mobility are not working. Economic and political life has been monopolized, and the old areas where a woman could make a dignified career, such as medicine and education, have been commercialized and become much more discriminatory," she says.

Many women say they still face one notorious Soviet legacy, the "double burden" of work and homemaking, which limits women's career choices and leaves them with virtually no time to themselves.

"I can manage in my workplace, I don't feel discriminated against as a woman," says Svetlana Golubeva, a colonel in Russia's MVD, or interior troops, which is a semi-militarized national police force. "In the MVD we have several female generals."

But, she adds, "I'm married with two children. As it is, my work day lasts from morning to night. If I go for a promotion, I know my work load will only grow. So, in practice, you have to make a choice between career and family. I don't want to lose my family."

Many women who went into politics during chaotic but hopeful democratic experiments of the 1990s have since quit public life. Some cite the narrowing of political opportunities under President Vladimir Putin and a greatly reduced tolerance for female participation.

Ella Pamfilova, a veteran politician, former minister of social services, and the first woman ever to run for president of Russia (in 2000 she got 1 percent of the vote) says attitudes are changing, but very slowly.

"Men have been at the top for a long time in Russia, but there is a feeling that male politics has exhausted itself," she says. "Women today are increasingly active in civil society, and most are forced to become active out of despair. Male politicians simply do not address women's issues. So women need to organize themselves. I hope we shall see a new wave of women coming into politics. We have lots of successful women in business, journalism, and other fields who see what must be done."

Today's State Duma has 61 female deputies, or about 14 percent, compared to around 50 percent in the old Supreme Soviet. Even that number may not reflect political reality, since the pro-Kremlin ruling party, United Russia, has revived the Soviet-era practice of padding its list of deputies with non-politician celebrities including quite a few female gymnasts, figure skaters, ballerinas, and others.

After two decades of post-Soviet, market-oriented change, many of the problems today's Russian women face might sound more familiar to their American contemporaries than to their Soviet mothers.

"Russian women have attained higher educational levels than the men, and that trend has been growing for the past ten years. Currently almost 60 percent of students in higher education are women," says Marina Baskakova, an expert with the official Institute of Economy in Moscow.

"This creates conflicts with tradition, because it's regarded as better to find a husband with a higher educational level than yourself. This is a serious problem not only for women, but for men too. A man finds himself in a tight corner: he's supposed to be the breadwinner, but he can't earn enough to keep the family going. It's driving social changes?. And this is happening amid a political situation that's becoming more conservative and tradition-oriented. Still, the situation is stable, for now," she adds.

Irina Khakamada, former Duma deputy and the second Russian woman ever to run for president (in 2004), has since withdrawn from political life but says she is optimistic that the younger generation of Russians are changing all the old equations.

"I look at the kids these days, and I see that it's different. Men these days want a woman who's clever, self-sufficient, able to earn money. The traditional model, where a woman's domain is the kitchen while the man is lord of everything, is disappearing. Of course our women have problems. Mainly they're looking for suitable men and there's a big shortage of those?."

"What I've learned is that in chaotic times, Russian women develop dynamically. Our men tend to prefer stability and predictability. Life in Russia is difficult, yet we go on."

Related stories

Read this story at csmonitor.com

Become a part of the Monitor community

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/international-womens-day-russian-women-want-change-not-184309061.html

mike dantoni bulls heat goldman sachs brandon carr knicks coach encyclopedia britannica pi

Indian IT Companies Eye Orders From Football World Cup And Olympics In Brazil


Kolkata: Big and small IT companies of the country are eyeing contracts in the ensuing World Cup Soccer and Olympics which would be held in Brazil in 2014 and 2016 respectively.


"The IT infrastructure budget for soccer World Cup and Olympics in Brazil is pegged at $180 billion. So, it is natural for the Indian IT companies to eye a sizable business from the two sporting events", executive director of Electronics and Computer Software Export Promotion Council (ESC) D K Sareen said.


Announcing the Indiasoft B2B international exposition 2013 which would be held in the city shortly, Sareen said that special focus would be given to Brazil from where a team of ten software companies are going to participate in the meet.


He said the Brazilian companies would hold B2B meetings with Indian IT companies, adding that possible deals for the sporting events might crystallize.


Besides Brazil, other Latin American countries participating are Chile, Peru, Argentina, Colombia, Honduras and Ecuador.


Sareen said that IT ministers of Ghana, Ivory Coast and Mauritius would also come to establish contacts with the Indian IT industry.


Director of Software Technology Park of India (STPI) M Nayak said that the government is toying with the idea of giving some benefits in the form of export incentives for IT units located in non-SEZ areas.


Chairman of ESC S Radhakrishnan said that SEZs were not the only solution for software exports.


"SEZ is an attraction for big companies. But the small and medium units are the future of the IT industry of the country", he said.


ESC had been set up by the commerce ministry for promotion of IT software and hardware exports.


Also Read: 10 Pioneers Of Cloud Computing


Also Read: 5 People Who Guard Apple From Hackers


Source: PTI

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/siliconindianews/~3/PYcwqxIzsYU/Indian-IT-Companies-Eye-Orders-From-Football-World-Cup-And-Olympics-In-Brazil-nid-142808-cid-7.html

wisconsin recall wisconsin recall doris day buffalo sabres texas news kim mulkey sarah palin today show

Al Gore Envisions 'The Future'

Copyright ? 2013 NPR. For personal, noncommercial use only. See Terms of Use. For other uses, prior permission required.

IRA FLATOW, HOST:

My next guest really needs almost no introduction. He's former vice president of the United States. He's one of the most well-known communicators of the risks of climate change. He shared the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize for those efforts. I'm guessing a lot of you have read his book, "An Inconvenient Truth," or you've seen the movie.

His latest book, "The Future," is, as the title suggests, a lot broader than that, a look at how everything from ultra-fast stock trading and genetic engineering, food shortages and Internet freedom, all these things, how will they shape the future. It's quite a tome. And don't worry. There's a chapter in there on climate change too.

Mr. Gore is also chairman of the Climate Reality Project, and he joins us here in our New York studios. Welcome to SCIENCE FRIDAY, Mr. Vice President.

VICE PRESIDENT AL GORE: Oh, thank you for having me.

FLATOW: You're welcome. We have an excerpt from your book, from the book, "The Future," at sciencefriday.com/algore, if you'd like to read it. This is a huge project that you tackle, "Six Drivers of the Global Change." And I read the drivers, and one of the things that strikes me is who is in the driver's seat on all of these things. How do we get the public to face these issues? Because it doesn't seem like we are in the mood to face anything big these days.

GORE: It does seem that way. And if you look at our situation, the situation of humanity on planet Earth, we have two large, powerful tools with which to shape the future: one is democracy, the other is capitalism. But both are in need of serious reforms. And here in the United States - the only country, in my view and in the view of many others, that is capable of providing the needed leadership in the world - we have a particular challenge because our democracy has been hacked. In order to put ourselves back in the driver's seat so that humankind can reclaim some control over our destiny, we really do have to remedy these problems with democracy and capitalism.

FLATOW: What do you mean democracy has been hacked? What do you mean by that?

GORE: Well, of course, it's a computer term that describes how a computer's operating system can be taken over and the computer forced to do things its owner doesn't want. Our operating system in the U.S. is our Constitution, and it's been hacked by big money, corporate influence, special interests, lobbying. Money plays an extremely unhealthy role in our democracy today. Its role has been growing ever since television replaced newsprint as the primary medium through which the conversation of democracy occurs.

And since television is dominant - it is a one-way medium - and access to it depends upon great wealth, politicians have been forced to raise ever larger sums of money, and the average senator or congressman today is forced to spend five hours a day begging special interests and wealthy people for money. And human nature being what it is, that twists and distorts the incentives our founders intended for them to respond to. Instead of thinking primarily about their constituents, too often they now think primarily about the sources of the cash they need in order to get re-elected.

FLATOW: Hmm. I'm Ira Flatow. This is SCIENCE FRIDAY from NPR, talking with Vice President Al Gore, author of "The Future: Six Drivers of Global Change." We talk about gridlock here. We talk about science. We talk about how - you know, facts. It seems that part of the problem with a government, as you say, being hacked is that, in many cases, science has become a matter of opinion to just use and twist it the way that you would like to to make a point.

GORE: Well, that's another symptom of the problem I'm describing. It used to be that we would search for the best available evidence, discuss and debate it. But when we reached the point where a proverbial, reasonable person would say, well, this is as close as we're going to be able to get to the truth, then our discussions would shift to what should we do about these facts that we've established.

Now facts remain battlegrounds, and those who have big, powerful megaphones are tempted to believe that they can continue arguing facts long after a reasonable person would call it over and even tempt them to believe they can create their own artificial realities.

FLATOW: Right.

GORE: And the consequences are dangerous. Let me just give a couple of quick examples. When we - when the Senate voted to endorse the invasion of Iraq, 75 percent of the American people had been convinced by those with big megaphones that Saddam Hussein was primarily responsible for 9/11. The subprime mortgages were portrayed successfully as virtually risk-free, but that's what created the credit crisis, the global run on the banks and the Great Recession that followed because the truth had been obscured.

Another example, actually, comes out of the discussion I was listening to just before I came in. We are putting the future of antibiotic - our antibiotic arsenal at risk. And the livestock industry - factory farming - has enough influence, through their contributions and lobbying, to prevent the prohibition against feeding antibiotics in sub-therapeutic doses as a growth stimulant to livestock. The scientists last year proved that a bacteria that was responsive to antibiotics jumped from humans to pigs after the pigs were fed antibiotics for a long period of time. This bacteria became resistant and then jumped back to humans. And this is happening routinely.

In any functioning democracy, this practice which is utterly insane, reckless, dangerous, would be prohibited. But because our democracy has been hacked, we are incapable of getting any reform through the Congress in its present pathetic state.

FLATOW: All right. We need to take a break and get some more solutions that Al Gore might suggest to us. I'm talking with Vice President Al Gore, author of "The Future: Six Drivers of Global Change." Our number is 1-800-989-8255. You can also tweet us @Scifri, @S-C-I-F-R-I. Go to our website and leave a message there. Just stay with us. We'll be right back after this break. I'm Ira Flatow and this is SCIENCE FRIDAY from NPR.

(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)

FLATOW: I'm Ira Flatow. This is SCIENCE FRIDAY. We're taking with Vice President Al Gore. His new book, "The Future: Six Drivers of Global Change." Our number: 1-800-989-8255. You've been writing all these books. You are the lightning rod for anything about the environment. You know, you get kicked when you're down. You get kicked when you're up like people who do I not believe. Has anybody been converted or do you care whether climate deniers, what they think?

GORE: Of course.

FLATOW: It's not important. Is this is not important anymore?

GORE: No. It is important because the conversation has to be one. And the forces of denial, which are lavishly funded by the large carbon polluters and some ideological groups, have intimidated many in the news media into remaining silent and not speaking out. Just an example, look at what happened last year. 2012 was the hottest year in American history. Sixty-one percent of our country was in extreme drought. It knocked a full percentage point off our GDP. The largest record fires in the west, the largest West Nile virus outbreak ever, $110 billion in climate-related disaster damage including, of course, Superstorm Sandy which devastated parts of this city and New Jersey and Long Island.

And yet, in spite of that, with more presidential campaign debates than ever in history, not a single journalist asked a single question that any of the candidates in any...

FLATOW: Yeah.

GORE: ...of the debates. It's almost like a family with an alcoholic father who flies into a rage if alcohol is mentioned. And so the rest of the family decides to keep the peace by never discussing the elephant in the middle of the room. And that is what the deniers have attempted to accomplish. Now, I think that Superstorm Sandy will be looked back upon something of a turning point. You saw President Obama's very inspiring statements in his inaugural address and the State of the Union Address. And I think that's symptomatic.

I just came from an event in Nassau County on Long Island. And I heard from a great many business leaders there, who said that the conversation has completely changed on Long Island. They were in the bulls-eye when Superstorm Sandy...

FLATOW: Right.

GORE: ...hit. And all over the country, these extreme weather events, that are getting worse, getting more frequent, are causing people to look at their hold cards.

FLATOW: Hmm-mm. Let's talk about some of the subjects in your book, "Six Drivers of Global Change." Let's talk about the Internet as a, you know, you have been credited with being one of the pioneers in the Internet, and rightly so, for defending its development. Did you ever imagine things like the social media being involved in like Arab Spring or those kinds of things that the Internet could influence?

GORE: Yes, yes. And of course, the jury is still out and will probably remain out for quite some time on what the results of Arab Spring were. It's not looking good in a lot of countries right now. But think for a moment about what's happened in Myanmar, Burma. The same pattern that has occurred in many places occurred there. There was an Internet inspired explosion of enthusiasm for democracy. Then it was snuffed out and it went back to stasis. But the embers kept burning. And a few years later, they flared up again. And now, there appears to be a process that includes movement toward genuine democratic reform there.

And yes, many did predict that it would have this impact because it puts individuals back into the conversation. Our country was founded during the era of the printing press when all the conversation in our democracy was in the printed word. And television starting in the last third of the 20th century really dampened that conversation and gave control to those who have large sums of money and a lot of power. The Internet has the clear potential to bring back the voices of individuals and a way of accessing the wisdom of crowds. That's what's made the United States the greatest country on Earth and what can restore our capacity to lead the world.

FLATOW: 1-800-989-8255. Let's go to the phones. Let's go to Ryan in Houston. Hi, Ryan.

RYAN: Oh. Hey, thanks for taking my call. I was kind of getting a little worried there. But thanks so much for taking my call. Greetings to you, former vice president. I was wondering, what do you think are the biggest obstacles to businesses, large businesses, small businesses changing to an Internet-based business model since really Internet-based business models are kind of like more, like more cost-efficient, faster, people are able to collaborate in real time.

You know, you have great successes like TiVo, like Kickstarter and all these things. What do you think are the biggest obstacles to businesses changing to an Internet-based model? And I'll take my answer off the air.

FLATOW: OK.

GORE: Well, I think the main obstacle is inertia and the habit we all have of wanting to continue doing things the same old way. But actually I see so many businesses making that transition right now at warp speed. It's incredible. And of course it's creative destruction. You're seeing the fate of newspapers hang in the balance, and yet you see the explosion of new digital models. This is going to be a turbulent transition because we're still in the early stages.

FLATOW: And you write in your book about speed, especially about consuming data. You referred to a new transatlantic cable being built for $300 million to increase the speed of data that flows between New York and London, an increase of just 5.2 milliseconds.

GORE: Yeah. Yeah...

FLATOW: And that's important to them.

GORE: Well, yes. You know, 60 percent of the trades in both the New York exchanges and the London exchanges are now made by high-performance, high-speed, high-frequency supercomputers. After the flash crash a little over a year ago, it took them five months to figure out why the market suddenly dropped 1,000 points in 20 minutes and then worked its way back up. And my friend Joe Stiglitz, who was one of the forensic investigators, suggested a new rule to remedy the problem: to have a requirement that offers to buy and sell remain open for one second.

And that proposal was roundly rejected out of hand amidst warnings that the entire edifice might collapse. So yes, milliseconds are important now, and they will soon be in the nanosecond realm, which will introduce even more risks from harmonics and instabilities. But yes, this is something that has placed a prime value on speed. Now, that in itself is not new. You know, the Rothschild fortune was originally made by using carrier pigeons to get earlier warnings - earlier news of the outcome of the Battle of Waterloo so that French bonds could be shorted. So...

FLATOW: Well, the telegraph was invented to get stock quotes, that sort of thing, yeah. Everybody's always looking for speed.

GORE: Yes, that's right. And yet we are now in this realm where the transactions are occurring so swiftly. And the economy is so tightly coupled and so complex are the transactions that you don't have time for individuals to figure out what goes wrong when something goes wrong.

FLATOW: Let's talk a bit about - here's a - I want to get to a tweet that came in. Tina Marie says: As an unemployed environmental scientist, I ask where are the green jobs? Why are there not more green jobs around and how - what could you do to stimulate more green jobs?

GORE: Well, we need policy that gives us accurate economic signals in the marketplace. Right now the carbon pollution that is causing global warming doesn't show up on our national accounts, it doesn't show up on any business ledgers, of profit and loss. We need to take that so-called externality, give it a price, either directly or indirectly, and internalize it into our calculations. And that will drive a surge of investment in green energy, renewable energy, energy efficiency and open up a lot more jobs.

Now, that having been said, there actually are a lot of green jobs being produced. This past year, if you look at the extra electricity generation produced in 2012, 58 percent of it was from wind and solar. Wind was the single largest new source of energy last year in the U.S. In 2010 on a global basis, for the first time investments in renewable energy exceeded the investments in fossil fuel energy.

And the cost down curve for solar and to a lesser extent, also wind, is so impressive now that in many areas it's now cheaper than electricity from coal. Australia just announced that wind electricity is now cheaper than that from any new coal or gas plant. So it is coming. It's coming too slowly and we need the policy that I mentioned to put a price on carbon in order to accelerate it.

FLATOW: Why would you do? Give us your thumbnail sketch of how to get out of the delays we're in in terms of making the changes you talk about in your book?

GORE: Put a price on carbon.

FLATOW: That's one.

GORE: That's one. Restore our ability to communicate on the basis of facts, increase access to broadband. There has to be an act of will on the part of we the people.

FLATOW: But that's the real problem. And you know, and a lot of people will say, well, I'm hearing it from Al Gore - and I don't like Al Gore so I'm not going to listen to Al Gore because he represents this administration, you know? And that's why I've asked you before, can you ever win over the people who just don't like hearing it coming from a Democratic president or someone like yourself?

GORE: Well, there's...

FLATOW: Do you need to be won over or can you go out then?

GORE: There's a voice far more powerful than mine or even - more powerful even than the voice of the president. And that is Mother Nature. And the year's events - I described them just a few minutes ago - they did get people's attention and the polling indicates a fairly dramatic shift.

And by the way, not just in the U.S. - China just announced a CO2 tax. It is implementing a cap-and-trade program in two cities and five provinces as a pilot for a nationwide program. India's put a tax on coal. Australia, the largest coal exporter in the world, has now implemented both a CO2 tax and cap-and-trade. Ireland. California, as of January 1. Quebec, British Columbia - seventeen other nations. The European Union continues on its course. So if China does indeed implement a CO2 tax, it is likely to become the center of gravity for a very large carbon trading market.

FLATOW: This is SCIENCE FRIDAY. I'm Ira Flatow, SCIENCE FRIDAY from NPR. I'm talking with Al Gore, author of "The Future: Six Drivers of Global Change."

Can you ever see yourself taking any sort of position in government again to try to become more active, to bring about some of these changes? Or are you happy to remain as private citizen?

GORE: Well, I would not take an appointed position and where running for president again is concerned, I write in this book that I'm a recovering politician on about step nine. And I've - I have been in recovery long enough to enhance my confidence that I won't ever relapse.

FLATOW: We have a tweet that's asking: What's on your turntable these days? What are you listening to in music - music-wise. What's your...

GORE: Well, I've been on this book tour for the last little bit and I haven't - I've been listening to some oldies but goodies. Jesse Winchester is one of my favorites.

FLATOW: Oh, yeah?

GORE: You ever listen to him?

FLATOW: Yeah, I've heard of him. You know, I'm still stuck in the '70s but I listen to...

GORE: Well, he is too.

(LAUGHTER)

FLATOW: Yeah. So I hear more - let's...

GORE: I'll tell you who is one of my real favorites. I was with him over the weekend is Jason Mraz. I think he's the real thing. He's - of course his "I'm Yours" was on the Billboard Top 100 for longer than any record ever in the 51-year history of that, and "I Won't Give Up On Us." I love his music.

FLATOW: None of the Dead still...

GORE: Yeah, I still listen to them. Absolutely.

FLATOW: 1-800-989-8255. I'm talking with Al Gore, author of "The Future: Six Drivers of Global Change." Do you ever have a chance to just relax and sit back?

GORE: Sure.

FLATOW: And, you know, you seem to be so busy. This book - a huge book. It's got a great, you know, deal of information in it.

GORE: Yeah. Number four this week on The New York Times list.

FLATOW: Number four. Get a little SCIENCE FRIDAY boost when you leave here tonight I think also.

GORE: Yeah. Absolutely.

(LAUGHTER)

FLATOW: Do you think about - I mean do you think about technology as an answer to many of these problems or is it going to take more of a personal motivation by somebody to get involved?

GORE: Well, I think it will take both. It will take both. We have the technologies available now to start solving the climate crisis and many of the other big challenges that I describe in this book. We can benefit from further advances in technology and they are coming. We've never had a time when we were going through so many revolutionary changes simultaneously.

But, yes - in answer to your original question - there will have to be an assertion by us that the citizens of the U.S. and us - those of us who live on Earth to preserve human values by making choices about the future instead of just letting the invisible hand and the marketplace and technological determinism sweep us along willy-nilly.

FLATOW: Can individuals make a difference?

GORE: Absolutely.

FLATOW: Or it's going to take something from the top.

GORE: Absolutely. We spoke earlier about the transition from print to television and then to the Internet. I think that moving the institutions of democracy as quickly as possible into Internet-based forms is one of the real keys. And as that happens, you will see more individuals making a difference. Already we see individual bloggers affecting the course of important national debates. We see a lot of young people empowered by the Internet, getting more active in their communities than any previous generation. And we see the beginnings of exciting experiments to move that model into national decision-making, national politics and national governance.

FLATOW: Mm-hmm. Mr. Vice President, we've run out of time. I want to thank you for taking time to be with us today.

GORE: Thank you.

FLATOW: Al Gore, author of "The Future: Six Drivers of Global Change." A very interesting read. I highly recommend it. Take it with you when you're going on vacation this weekend.

That's about all the time we have for today. Greg Smith composed our theme music and we had help today from NPR librarian Kee Malesky. Missed any part of our program, you like to hear it again, you can subscribe to our podcast. We have audio and video, a video pick of the week is - you're going to love it. It's an old - it's an oldie but goodie up there on our website. And you can also go to iTunes and Android apps, and listen to our website at sciencefriday.com. Join our mailing list there. Also all week long active on Twitter @scifri and on our Facebook page, scifri also. Have a great weekend. We'll see you next week. I'm Ira Flatow in New York.

Copyright ? 2013 NPR. All rights reserved. No quotes from the materials contained herein may be used in any media without attribution to NPR. This transcript is provided for personal, noncommercial use only, pursuant to our Terms of Use. Any other use requires NPR's prior permission. Visit our permissions page for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR's programming is the audio.

Source: http://www.npr.org/2013/03/08/173821492/al-gore-envisions-the-future?ft=1&f=1007

turkey Pumpkin Pie Recipe wii u wii u American Music Awards turkey brine Imessage Not Working